Below is a rough translation and some preliminary remarks about Luke 2:41-52, the Gospel text from the Revised Common Lectionary for the Sunday after Christmas in Year C. This is the only
41 Καὶ ἐπορεύοντο οἱ γονεῖς αὐτοῦ κατ' ἔτος εἰς Ἰερουσαλὴμ τῇ ἑορτῇ τοῦ
And his parents were going according to a year into Jerusalem in the feast of the Passover.
ἐπορεύοντο: IMI 3p, πορεύω to go
2. The preposition κατά can take on many meanings and I’m assuming that κατά ἔτος is a colloquial way of saying, “every year” or “annually.”
3. I love when the gospel writers give a glimpse of Jesus’ family life, with observations like this, or that Jesus went to the synagogue on the Sabbath “as was his custom,” and so forth.
4. Combining this family/community observance with the term οἱ γονεῖς, Luke is engaging in the age-old debate of “nature or nurture?” and answering, correctly, “Yes.”
42 καὶ ὅτε ἐγένετο ἐτῶν δώδεκα, ἀναβαινόντων αὐτῶν κατὰ τὸ ἔθος τῆς
And when he became twelve years, they having gone up according to the custom of the feast,
ἐγένετο: AMI, 3s, γίνομαι to become
1. Most translations end this verse with a period. I am going to use a comma to show that there are a string of dependent clauses, that wait until the next verse to arrive at a main verb.
2. The number twelve and references to twelve years of age are more common in the gospels than the more modern tendency to divide time into decades. I will leave the details to historians, but I suspect the earth’s annual trips around the sun, known primarily via agricultural seasons, led ancient peoples to observe twelve moon phases per year, making the number twelve meaningful. We recently met Anna, in vv.37-38, who was 84, the product of a week of twelves.
3. I always want this story to be a Bar Mitzvah kind of story for Jesus and it’s not hard to squeeze it into that mold, but initially the journey to Jerusalem when Jesus is twelve is to honor the annual custom, not to mark a milestone for Jesus.
43 καὶ τελειωσάντων τὰς ἡμέρας, ἐν τῷ ὑποστρέφειν αὐτοὺς ὑπέμεινεν
and the days having been completed, in their returning, Jesus the child remained in Jerusalem, and his parents did not know.
τελειωσάντων: AAPart gpm, τελειόω to make perfect, complete
1. The dependent clauses continue, until we reach the main verb of vv. 42-43: “remained.” The parents, the custom, the completion, and even the ignorance about their missing son are all context to the fact that the child Jesus remained.
2. Luke refers to Jesus as Ἰησοῦς ὁ παῖς, Jesus, the child. According to Thayer’s lexicon, “the period παῖς covers is not sharply defined.”
3. The observation “his parents did not know” and the timing of this text in the lectionary evokes the “Kevin!” moment from “Home Alone” and I cannot deny it.
44 νομίσαντες δὲ αὐτὸν εἶναι ἐν τῇ συνοδίᾳ ἦλθον ἡμέρας ὁδὸν καὶ ἀνεζήτουν αὐτὸν ἐν τοῖς συγγενεῦσιν καὶ τοῖς γνωστοῖς,
νομίσαντες: AAPart npm, νομίζω to think
2. Again, we get a glimpse of first century faithful families, traveling together, minding one another’s kids, granting a bit of leeway to the young ones as they get older by allowing them to hang out with their friends, etc. The casual assumption is what makes the missing Jesus such a shock, but apart from the fact that Jesus remained behind, it is a delightful observation about how a family would negotiate this annual journey.
3. ἀναζητέω is the first of two terms that this story uses which can mean seek, search, or find. Both of those words appear in the next verse.
45 καὶ μὴ εὑρόντες ὑπέστρεψαν εἰς Ἰερουσαλὴμ ἀναζητοῦντες αὐτόν.
εὑρόντες: AAPart npm, εὑρίσκω to find, to seek
a. εὑρίσκω is often translated as find, and is used 45x in Luke, starting with 2:12, “you will find the babe swaddled in bands of cloth …” In Bullinger’s lexicon, the possibilities of εὑρίσκω are “to find, as without seeking” and “to find as by search.” Likewise in Thayer’s lexicon it is either to find by seeking or to find without seeking.
b. ἀναζητέω is a combination of the prefix ἀνα, which means up, and ζητέω, which means to seek or search. As a combined term, it only appears in vv. 44 and 45 here, and in Acts 11:25 to describe Barnabas searching for Paul. The root ζητέω, however, appears quite frequently in the NT and means “to seek in order to find.”
The use of both terms here reminds me of a moment in The Silver Chair, one of the Chronicles of Narnia, when Jill and Eustace meet Marsh-wiggle Puddleglum, and Jill says, “We've got to start by finding a ruined city of giants.” Puddleglum answers, “Got to start by finding it, have we? … Not allowed to start by looking for it, I suppose?”
For some reason that little snatch of conversation has always kept me aware of the relationship between seeking and finding that the importance of finding something by looking for it and discovering something without looking for it.
46 καὶ ἐγένετο μετὰ ἡμέρας τρεῖς εὗρον αὐτὸν ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ καθεζόμενον ἐνμέσῳ τῶν διδασκάλων καὶ ἀκούοντα αὐτῶν καὶ ἐπερωτῶντα αὐτούς:
ἐγένετο: AMI 3s, γίνομαι to become
2. After seeking, they found him. Puddleglum would be proud of this story’s arc.
3. The child Jesus is in the temple, sitting with the teachers, listening to them, and interrogating them. Man, I wish we had a transcript of that conversation!
4. Jesus was listening to them.
5. I frequently like to translated ἐπερωτάω as “interrogate” rather than simply “ask,” because it is frequently the term used for disputes, challenges, or trick questions. In its best sense, it is another way of seeking in order to find.
47 ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες οἱ ἀκούοντες αὐτοῦ ἐπὶ τῇ συνέσει καὶ ταῖς ἀποκρίσεσιν αὐτοῦ.
ἐξίσταντο: IMI 3p, ἐξίστημι to be amazed
2. I’m also letting the genitive αὐτοῦ, of him, modify both Jesus’ synthesizing and his answers.
3. The verb ἐξίστημι means to displace, with the prefix ἐξ meaning out and the root ίστημι meaning to place or to stand. Together, it can mean to be beside oneself, so amazed or astounded are possibilities.
48 καὶ ἰδόντες αὐτὸν ἐξεπλάγησαν, καὶ εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτὸν ἡ μήτηρ αὐτοῦ, Τέκνον, τί ἐποίησαςἡμῖν οὕτως; ἰδοὺ ὁ πατήρ σου κἀγὼ ὀδυνώμενοι ἐζητοῦμέν σε.
ἰδόντες: AAPart nmp, εἴδω to see
2. The word ὀδυνάω is used in the parable of Luke 16:24-25 to describe the Rich Man tormenting in flames after death. That’s how Mary describes her and Joseph’s last three days. It’s powerful.
3. ἰδοὺ is often described as a particle, but it is the imperative form of the word εἴδω, to look or to see. Stricly, Mary commands the child Jesus to see what the last three days have been for her and Joseph.
49 καὶ εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτούς, Τί ὅτι ἐζητεῖτέ με; οὐκ ᾔδειτε ὅτι ἐν τοῖς τοῦ πατρός μου δεῖεἶναί με;
2. Wits aside, Mary tells Jesus to behold, “See!” and Jesus respond, “Did you not see?”
3. There seems to be a significant variant in this verse, which isn’t showing up in my Greek Bible, regarding “my father’s things” v. “my father’s house.” Maybe it’s not a variant but an interpretive decision. The text I have simply has τοῖς τοῦ πατρός μου, so the τοῖς is a substantive pronoun that might be the things, which is modified by the genitival phrase τοῦ πατρός μου, of the father of me.
50 καὶ αὐτοὶ οὐ συνῆκαν τὸ ῥῆμα ὃ ἐλάλησεν αὐτοῖς.
συνῆκαν: AAI 3p, συνίημι to understand
1. The verb συνίημι appears in v.47 above in its nominal form σύνεσις. There, I translated it as “the synthesizing” and here I’m going with “synthesize. But I’m only doing that for the rough translation, to show how connected those terms are and to pick up on the prefix συν/syn. These terms don’t seem to have significant roots that the prefix σύν is modifying as much as they are nominal and verbal expressions of the σύν, the togethering, as it were. It’s usually translated as “understand” here, as in putting the pieces together to make sense of it.
2. It seems that one can approach this text from two very different angles. Jesus, as we know through the birth narrative, is exceptional, called, the one sent from God, the son of God. In that sense, perhaps it should be obvious to Mary and Joseph, if not the onlookers who are astounded in the temple, that this is his native soil.
I’ve heard preachers approach this story also questioning Mary’s and Joseph’s lack of synthesis as Jesus’ words imply. But just because this story follows on the heels of the infancy narratives, we should remember that it is twelve years later. And this is the only story we get of Jesus between the infancy and adult narratives. It is not a story when Jesus gets up one morning and says, “Mom, I’m going to the temple where I belong.” When they went to Jerusalem, it was the family’s custom that Jesus was part of, Jesus initiative. When they returned, they assumed that he was within their companions, which presumably he was every other time they made this annual visit. I think preachers should back down a little bit if their full-blown Christology makes it sound like Mary and Joseph were dunderheads for not saying, “Hmm, Jesus isn’t here, I guess he’s back at the temple doing his father’s business.”
However, this story is challenging, because Jesus seems entirely unsympathetic to the fact that his parents have been tormented for three days. Maybe it is because he is twelve and entirely in the moment. Perhaps other-awareness (along with temperance) are attributes of maturity and wisdom. But let’s be honest, this comment seems a little bratty.
51 καὶ κατέβη μετ'αὐτῶν καὶ ἦλθεν εἰς Ναζαρέθ, καὶ ἦν ὑποτασσόμενος αὐτοῖς. καὶ ἡ μήτηρ αὐτοῦ διετήρει πάντατὰ ῥήματα ἐν τῇ καρδίᾳ αὐτῆς.
κατέβη: AAI 3p, καταβαίνω to come down
2. Mary treasured all these words (or sayings or things) in her heart. This is a repeat of v.19, after the shepherds told about their angelic visit. In v. 19 Luke uses συντηρέω; here he uses διατηρέω.
52 Καὶ Ἰησοῦς προέκοπτεν [ἐν τῇ] σοφίᾳ καὶ ἡλικίᾳ καὶ χάριτι παρὰ θεῷ καὶ ἀνθρώποις.
προέκοπτεν: IAI 3s, προκόπτω to advance
2. Jesus advances in maturity and grace. ἡλικίᾳ can mean physical or mental growth, just like maturity. So, some translations say years, others say stature.
As I mentioned above, this is the only story in the Gospels that we get about Jesus in between the infancy and adult narratives. I consider that a great discipline among the gospel writers not to create childhood stories that would try to verify Jesus' divinity prior to his adult stories. There is a set of such stories, The Infancy Gospel of Thomas, which gives is a whirl and creates a fairly intolerable Jesus, with stories of Jesus' healing and resurrecting power, alongside his hot temper and refusal to be taught. Curiously, that "gospel" (perhaps from the 1400s) ends with this story, close but not quite the same as Luke's story:
And when he was twelve years old his parents went according to the custom unto Jerusalem to the feast of the passover with their company: and after the passover they returned to go unto their house. And as they returned the child Jesus went back to Jerusalem; but his parents supposed that he was in their company. And when they had gone a day's journey, they sought him among their kinsfolk, and when they found him not, they were troubled, and returned again to the city seeking him. And after the third day they found him in the temple sitting in the midst of the doctors and hearing and asking them questions. And all men paid heed to him and marvelled how that being a young child he put to silence the elders and teachers of the people, expounding the heads of the law and the parables of the prophets. And his mother Mary came near and said unto him: Child, wherefore hast thou so done unto us? behold we have sought thee sorrowing. And Jesus said unto them: Why seek ye me? know ye not that I must be in my Father's house? But the scribes and Pharisees said: Art thou the mother of this child? and she said: I am. And they said unto her: Blessed art thou among women because God hath blessed the fruit of thy womb. For such glory and such excellence and wisdom we have neither seen nor heard at any time. And Jesus arose and followed his mother and was subject unto his parents: but his mother kept in mind all that came to pass. And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature and grace. Unto him be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
from http://www.gnosis.org/library/inftoma.htm accessed 12/27/24.
Considering Mary and Joseph's torment during their search, I wonder if part of that also came from their past flight from Herod. How could you lose the one declared to be the Messiah?!? How could you explain that to God?!?
ReplyDeleteDid they think the Messiah in their charge would somehow become a conquering Davidic-style king ushered in with angels and miraculous military victories as Jewish tradition at the time contended?
But a child — in the Temple, no less — with ideas of his own! That wasn't on their bingo card.
I liked your observation about other-awareness! Teens do tend to be single minded.
Thanks for your commentary. It sure helps to see some of the nuances that go into translation.
Thanks for your kind note. If we merge Matthew's story of the flight from Herod with Luke's infancy stories, your question is intriguing. Having been warned, then protecting the child, now they lose him. That would be a hard thing to bear.
DeleteThanks again for your note.
V47. Synthesis and analysis/distinctions??
ReplyDeleteHi Bruce,
DeleteWhen I was studying Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, we tried to distinguish arguments that we analytical and those that were synthetic. The difference was that the analytical would express ideas that were inherent in what had already been said, while the synthetic would connect and extend those ideas further. I guess that's what the "syn" prefix implies, some kind of bringing together in connection.
Thanks for your note.