Below is
a rough translation and some preliminary comments regarding Luke 15:1-10, the
Revised Common Lectionary gospel reading for the 17th Sunday after
Pentecost.
For those who are interested, I have an essay on the 14th Psalm on this week's "Politics of Scripture" blog entitled "The Politics of Foolishness." You can read it here.
For those who are interested, I have an essay on the 14th Psalm on this week's "Politics of Scripture" blog entitled "The Politics of Foolishness." You can read it here.
1 ησαν δὲ αὐτῷ ἐγγίζοντες πάντες οἱ τελῶναι καὶ οἱ ἁμαρτωλοὶ ἀκούειν
αὐτοῦ.
Yet there were gathering to him all
the tax collectors and the sinners to hear him.
ησαν: IAI, 3p, εἰμί,
1) to be, to exist, to happen, to be present
ἐγγίζοντες: PAPart npm, ἐγγίζω,
1) to bring near, to join one thing to another 2) to draw or come near
to, to approach
ἀκούειν: PAInf, ἀκούω,
1) to be endowed with the faculty of hearing, not deaf 2) to hear
1. Just so we do not let the insertion
of chapter divisions interrupt the flow of the Gospel, it helps to remember
where c.14 left off just before this pericope. In last week's text, Luke notes that "many crowds" were following alongside of Jesus. Then Jesus says some
pretty audacious stuff like this: "Whoever would be my disciple must hate your family and life itself" And this:“None of you can become my disciple if you
do not give up all your possessions.” We do not know what effect that strong call to discipleship had on the many crowds. Luke now shifts from that horde to the tax collectors and
sinners who are gathering to him to hear him. Are they the only ones left?
2. I never know quite what to do with the δὲ that begins this sentence. It is one of those words that does not appear first in the text, but usually appears first in the translation. It can mean 'and' or 'but' or 'then' and I usually leave it as neutral as I can in the rough translation. Hence "yet." If, however, we think the mentioning of all the tax collectors and sinners is a contrast to the many crowds of the previous pericope, we might go with "but." That's an interpretive call.
3. There is no mention in this verse
that there is food involved.
2 καὶ διεγόγγυζονοἵ τε Φαρισαῖοι καὶ οἱ γραμματεῖς λέγοντες ὅτι Οὗτος
ἁμαρτωλοὺς προσδέχεται καὶ συνεσθίει αὐτοῖς.
And both Pharisees and scribes
were murmuring saying, “He receives sinners and eats with them”
διεγόγγυζονοἵ : IAI 3pl, διαγογγύζω,
1) to murmur 1a) either of a whole crowd, or among one another 1b)
always used of many indignantly complaining
λέγοντες: PAPart npm, λέγω, 1) to say, to
speak
προσδέχεται: PMI 3s, προσδέχομαι, 1) to receive to one's
self, to admit, to give access to one's self
συνεσθίει: PAI 3s, συνεσθίω, 1) to eat
with, take food together with
1. The pairing of “all the tax
collectors and the sinners” and the pairing of “both the Pharisees and the scribes”
in vv. 1 and 2 seems deliberate. One pair is gathering to hear, the other is
complaining.
2. The verb συνεσθίω, a combination of
“eats” (εσθίω) and the prefix “with” (συν), is the first of many
words having the prefix συν in this text. I’m going to make them red to spot them more easily.
3. I wonder how different life would be
if the primary complaint against the church was “They receive sinners and eat
with them.”
4. The word διαγογγύζω (murmuring) is used here and in
Luke 19:7, “And when they saw it, they all murmured,
saying that he was gone to be guest with a man that is a sinner.” It is the LXX
word for those events when the people of Israel “murmured” against Moses and
God during their wilderness journey. See my commentary below about it.
3 εἶπεν δὲ πρὸς αὐτοὺς τὴν παραβολὴν ταύτην λέγων,
Yet he spoke to them this parable
saying,
εἶπεν: AAI 3s, λέγω,
1) to say, to speak
λέγων: PAPart nsm, λέγω,
1) to say, to speak
1. It's curious that this verse sets up a parable, but the next verse starts with a rhetorical question. In fact, the entire parable itself might be seen as a rhetorical question.
4 Τίς ἄνθρωπος ἐξ ὑμῶν ἔχων ἑκατὸν πρόβατα καὶ ἀπολέσας ἐξ αὐτῶν ἓν οὐ
καταλείπει τὰ ἐνενήκοντα ἐννέα ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ καὶ πορεύεται ἐπὶ τὸ ἀπολωλὸς ἕως εὕρῃ αὐτό;
“What person out of you having a
hundred sheep and having lost one out of them does not leave behind the
ninety-nine in the wilderness and go after the lost one until he might find
it?
ἔχων: PAPart nsm, ἔχω,
1) to have, i.e. to hold
ἀπολέσας: AAPart nsm, ἀπόλλυμι,
1) to destroy … 2a) to lose
καταλείπει: PAI 3s, καταλείπω,
1) to leave behind
πορεύεται: PMI 3s, πορεύομαι,
1) to lead over, carry over, transfer 1a) to pursue the journey on
which one has entered
ἀπολωλὸς:
PAPart asn, ἀπόλλυμι, 1) to destroy … 2a) to lose
εὕρῃ: AASubj 3s, εὑρίσκω,
1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet with 1a) after searching, to find
a thing sought
1. I’ve often heard this choice to leave the ninety-nine and seek the one represented as a sign of God’s extreme and unique love for the stray. But, with the phrasing of this question/parable, Jesus seems to be related it to real shepherding practices. I must admit, so far removed from the pastoral life of keeping literal flocks, I don’t know if the listeners are supposed to think, “Of course we would go after the lost one,” or “Of course we wouldn’t leave the 99 vulnerable in the wilderness to retrieve a single lost one.” If is it something every good shepherd would do, then Jesus’ companionship with sinners is like a good shepherd. If it is something no shepherd in their right mind would do, then Jesus’ companionship with sinners exceeds our customary cost/benefit approach to sinners.
2. Whoever added punctuation to the text, chose to put the question mark here. I would guess that it could also be placed after v.6, making the entire scenario a rhetorical question.
5 καὶ εὑρὼν ἐπιτίθησιν ἐπὶ τοὺς ὤμους αὐτοῦ χαίρων,
And having found it places it on his shoulders rejoicing,
εὑρὼν: AAPart nsm, εὑρίσκω,
1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet with 1a) after searching, to find
a thing sought
ἐπιτίθησιν: PAI 3s, ἐπιτίθημι,
1) in the active voice 1a) to put or lay upon
χαίρων: PAPart nsm, χαίρω,
1) to rejoice, be glad
1. I have supplied “it” as the object of
the verbs, following most translations.
2. Let’s not miss the shepherd’s joy. The act of placing the sheep on his shoulders might be a tenderness, or it might indicate difficult terrain, injury, even a more practical way to get back to the flock – I don’t know much about the craft. But the joy. It’s not “all in a day’s work.” It’s joy-filled.
6 καὶ ἐλθὼν εἰς τὸν οἶκον συγκαλεῖ τοὺς φίλους καὶ τοὺς γείτονας λέγων
αὐτοῖς, Συγχάρητέ μοι, ὅτι εὗρον τὸ πρόβατόν μου τὸ ἀπολωλός.
And having come into the house
calls together the friends and the neighbors saying to them, ‘Rejoice together
with me, because I found my sheep that has been lost.’
ἐλθὼν: AAPart nsm, ἔρχομαι,
1) to come
συγκαλεῖ: PAI 3s, συγκαλέω,
1) to call together, assemble 2) to call together to one's self
λέγων: PAPart nsm, λέγω,
1) to say, to speak
Συγχάρητέ: APImpv 2p, συγχαίρω,
1) to rejoice with, take part in another's joy 2) to rejoice
together, to congratulate
εὗρον: AAI 1s, εὑρίσκω,
1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet with 1a) after searching, to find
a thing sought
ἀπολωλός:
PerfAPart asn, ἀπόλλυμι, 1) to destroy … 2a) to lose
1. I know that “rejoice together with
me” is a bit redundant, but it is part of my effort to be attentive to the συν (and sometimes συγ) words of this text.
2. We have συγκαλέω (call together) and συγχαίρω (rejoice together)
as συν words in
this verse.
3. I’m hearing the invitation “rejoice
together with me” as the antithesis of the criticism, “he receives sinners and
eats with them.” And, frankly, it seems to be the point of the story. One can either rejoice or mummer over tax collectors and sinners gathering around Jesus.
7 λέγω ὑμῖν ὅτι οὕτως χαρὰ ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ ἔσται ἐπὶ ἑνὶ ἁμαρτωλῷ μετανοοῦντι ἢ ἐπὶ ἐνενήκοντα ἐννέα δικαίοις οἵτινες οὐ χρείαν ἔχουσιν μετανοίας.
I say to you that likewise joy
shall be in the heaven over one sinner that repents rather than ninety-nine
righteous who do not need having repentance.
λέγω: PAI 1s, λέγω,
1) to say, to speak
ἔσται: FMI 3s, εἰμί,
1) to be, to exist, to happen, to be present
μετανοοῦντι: PAPart dsm, μετανοέω,
1) to change one's mind, i.e. to repent
ἔχουσιν: PAI 3p, ἔχω,
1) to have, i.e. to hold
1. Many persons in the church today
follow a fairly Pauline approach to sin: Doctrines that begin with ‘all have
sinned,’ ethics that begin (as Karl Barth’s writings on ethics began) with the
phrase “No one is good but God alone,” or worship liturgy that regularly
involves confession and pardon, etc. To persons within that tradition, language
like this – “ninety nine righteous who do not need repentance” – is a bit
jarring. It is tempting to think that Jesus is being sly or facetious and
intending us to hear, “ninety-nine supposedly
righteous who think they do not need
repentance.” I think, however, there is
just a different understanding of sin or use of the word “sinner” at work here, and a concomitant different understanding of the meaning of “repentance.” It began with the narrator’s language of v.1, making reference to tax collectors
and sinners. That reference seems to point to some, not all, and so does not reflect
the more Pauline language that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of
God.” (But, since systematic theology is always a second-order process, that’s our challenge and certainly not Luke’s problem.)
2. Still, it would be very difficult to imagine that Jesus, or Luke, would say that the “sinners” who are gathered around Jesus need repentance, while the murmuring Pharisees and scribes have no need of repentance. So, it may be reasonable to presume some sly or facetious meaning here. Or, perhaps Jesus does not see the Pharisees and scribes as needing the same kind of “repentance” that tax collectors and sinners need. Their chief failure, at least in these stories it seems, is that they do not know how to rejoice over others who find their way. A lot is riding on how we hear the word “repentance.”
3. Since “repent” (μετανοίας) literally means a change of mind, and “sinners” seem to be a lost sheep, not an evil sheep, the issue of repentance may not be defined as “things done and left undone in thought, word, and deed,” but as “finding one’s way home.”
8 Ἢ τίς γυνὴ δραχμὰς ἔχουσα δέκα, ἐὰν ἀπολέσῃ δραχμὴν μίαν, οὐχὶ ἅπτει
λύχνον καὶ σαροῖ τὴν οἰκίαν καὶ ζητεῖ ἐπιμελῶς ἕως οὗ εὕρῃ;
Or what woman having ten drachmas,
if she were to lose one drachma, would not light a light and sweep the house
and search carefully until she finds it?
ἔχουσα: PAPart nsf, ἔχω,
1) to have, i.e. to hold
ἀπολέσῃ: AASubj 3s, ἀπόλλυμι,
1) to destroy … 2a) to lose
ἅπτει: PAI 3s, ἅπτω,
1) to fasten to, adhere to 1a) to fasten fire to a thing, kindle, set
of fire
σαροῖ: PAI 3s, σαρόω,
1) to sweep, clean by sweeping
ζητεῖ: PAI 3s, ζητέω,
1) to seek in order to find
εὕρῃ:
AASubj 3s, εὑρίσκω, 1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet
with 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought
1. Reading Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel, The Buried Giant, recently, I was struck
with how significant it could be to “light a light.” First, candles or oil lamps have not always been as
easily attainable as one might imagine today. Second, many poor communities
live in housing that are interlinked in some way, either built with shared
walls or built into the side of the same hill. In one scene from The Buried Giant, the community refused
to allow an older couple to have a candle because they seemed a little unsteady
and forgetful, and a moment of unsteadiness or forgetfulness with a candle
could mean disaster for the community. The lack of a candle was a great
hardship for the older couple.
2. Likewise, the OT and NT have several
stories about lighting lamps, where having or lacking oil is of great
significance. For this woman – no other family is mentioned – to burn a
precious commodity like oil to search for the missing coin shows how desperate
she was to find it. Imagine having only one AA battery for the year, and using it in a flashlight to search all night, instead of waiting for the morning sun. That is a sign of urgency, reminding us that the lost drachma was a real crisis for this woman.
3. Does anyone know how valuable a δραχμὰς/drachma is? Bullinger's lexicon has this helpful information: “as much as one can hold in the hand; an Attic weight, a drachma, or dram, about 66 grains avdp.; a silver coin worth 6 obols, that is nearly 9 ¾ denarius.” That clears it up nicely.
4. This second of three parables challenges the way we often hear the first and third parables. When we hear of a lost/wandering sheep or a lost/wandering son, we often focus on the agency of the one who is lost or wandering. The fact that we call the third parable “The Prodigal Son” shows that we’re focused on what he did that was so wrong and awful to is father. I think we move in that direction partly because of the “tax collectors and sinners” context that starts this string of parables. That’s good sermon fodder, I guess, but this parable gives us pause. The coin has no agency. It is lost, but it didn’t wander off. It did not do loathsome things. It’s the lostness, the condition of not being where one ought to be, that is similar in all three stories, not the waywardness. So, unless we want to give this coin legs and a will, we need to let this parable challenge our reading of the first and third, and our definition of what constitutes “sinners.”
9 καὶ εὑροῦσα συγκαλεῖ τὰς φίλας καὶ γείτονας λέγουσα, Συγχάρητέ μοι, ὅτι
εὗρον τὴν δραχμὴν ἣν ἀπώλεσα.
And having found calls together the
friends and neighbors saying, ‘Rejoice together with me, because I found the
drachma which I lost.’
εὑροῦσα: AAPart nsf, εὑρίσκω,
1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet with 1a) after searching, to find
a thing sought
συγκαλεῖ: PAI 3s, συγκαλέω,
1) to call together, assemble 2) to call together to one's self
λέγουσα: PAPart nsf, λέγω,
1) to say, to speak
Συγχάρητέ: APImpv 2p, συγχαίρω,
1) to rejoice with, take part in another's joy 2) to rejoice
together, to congratulate
εὗρον: AAI 1s, εὑρίσκω,
1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet with 1a) after searching, to find
a thing sought
ἀπώλεσα: AAI 1s, ἀπόλλυμι,
1) to destroy … 2a) to lose
1. The comedian in me says, “Hey, as
long as she has already swept the house she might as well invite some people
over.”
2. Again the double συν action of calling together friends and
neighbors to rejoice together.
3. Some pastor friends and I are discussing a recent (2025) Pew report that seems to indicate that the declining number of persons who associate with Christian churches is leveling off. It raises the question of whether the ‘leveling off’ of declining numbers is a positive sign or simply a ‘less negative sign.’ If one thinks that numbers matter, does one rejoice over news that isn’t as bad as it could have been? Sometimes, less negativity is as rejoice-worthy as net positivity.
4. This woman is relieved, and rightly so. The discovery of the lost coin, like the finding of the lost sheep, is wonderful news. Curiously, the net result is not that she gained a coin - the story begins with her having ten - but that she didn’t lose a coin, at least not permanently.
10οὕτως, λέγω ὑμῖν, γίνεται χαρὰ ἐνώπιον τῶν ἀγγέλων τοῦ θεοῦ ἐπὶ ἑνὶ
ἁμαρτωλῷ μετανοοῦντι.
Just so I say to you, there will
be joy among the angels of God over one sinner that repents.”
λέγω: PAI 1s, λέγω,
1) to say, to speak
γίνεται: PMI 3s, γίνομαι,
1) to become, i.e. to come into existence, begin to be, receive being
2) to become, i.e. to come to pass, happen
μετανοοῦντι: PAPart dsm, μετανοέω,
1) to change one's mind, i.e. to repent
1. Again, the words “sinner” and “repent” seem to have a different meaning than we often hear in them. A wonderful guide for me has been the hymn, “I Will Arise.” In the Glory to God hymnal, each song is titled with its first phrase, so this song appears there as “Come Ye Sinners, Poor and Needy.” It feels like yet another moment when the church is wagging its crooked finger at others and threatening them with hellfire and brimstone if they don't straighten up and fly right.
2. But soft! The song does not play into that kind of judgmental tone at all, because the word “sinner” does not mean “foul, loathsome, worm,” but the "poor and needy, sick and sore." For those, Jesus stands ready to receive and nurture. My sense is that “sinner” and “repent” throughout this text is not someone whose heart is evil - though it may be wandering far from its rightful home - but lost. Confused. Unseen. Endangered. Despised. Discounted. You get my point.
These two parables focus on joy and specifically shared
joy over the recovery of something lost. The one who risked much and the one
who worked diligently to find the lost share their joy with friends and
neighbors. The dictums at the end of the parable declare that shared joy to be ‘in
heaven’ in the first parable and ‘among the angels of God’ in the second.
Against this shared joy is the murmuring of both
the Pharisees and the scribes. Murmuring is a collective action, but the
opposite of sharing joy. We can almost hear the invitation, “Grouse with me,
because Jesus is sitting with sinners!” There are few things in this world that
can bring people together as effectively and passionately as collective
complaining. Almost every political action organization fundraising letter
leads with some version of “They are receiving sinners and eating with them!”
Murmuring elicits passion, it elicits action, and it builds togetherness of a
sort.
As I continue to reflect on this text, I think the
next time I hear or give a rallying cry based on something I find
objectionable, I may need to stop and wonder if there is a moment of collective
rejoicing that I ought to honor. It may prove fruitless, but at least that
exercise would enable me to discern whether my complaint is really “righteous
indignation” or if I am simply murmuring.
We often hear that Jesus hung out with the "wrong" crowd. But what if we look at it the other way around. The "wrong" crowd liked to hang around with Jesus. That should give us loads to think about what Jesus was saying to them. If he were constantly haranguing them for being sinners, they would not be hanging around for long. It seems obvious to me he offered an incredibly hopeful message to these lost folks. Imagine the punchline of the pharisee and the tax collector with this group. "Hey, we're not written off. There's a way through." Perhaps a different angle with these two parables is that Jesus is teaching them how important it is to seek for what is lost within themselves.
ReplyDeleteWhat if the answer to Jesus' question in verse 4 is "No one!"? No one would risk losing 99 sheep to wolves, thieves, and the sheep's own wanderings by leaving them alone in the wilderness. I think the shock of this parable to Jesus' listeners is the fact they are left.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great question and I've often pushed it out of my mind instead of stating it as such and dealing with it. I think your answer, "No one" is precisely what we ought to anticipate as the obvious answer before we go any further.
DeleteThe answer "No one" seems to lessen as the parables continue. I always thought that the least convincing part of the story of Job was how having many more children in the end was somehow supposed to make up for having lost children in the beginning. It works numerically, but not relationally.
DeleteIn the parable of the lost coin there's not the dilemma of having to leave the 9 unguarded to search for the 10th. And in the parable of the sons that follows, no one pretends that having one makes up for losing one.
So, taken separately, "No one" seems to be a possible answer to the question of v.4. Taken together,"No one" does not seem to be where this trilogy of parables is going.
The wilderness is at the heart of Israel's mythology (stories that hold a community together, give it an identity etc). The 99 are left in the safety and security (and joy even) of their mythology; the lost sheep has lost that security, identity and joy. Only through repentance is that sinner restored and linked in again with the community's joy/myth/song. Repentance, then, is the sinner being found and not the sinner 'finding Jesus'.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. The sheep and the coin are passive actors in the story, being hunted down by the sheep-chaser and the coin-seeker. Reminds me of the 'hound of heaven' image.
ReplyDeletede-moralizes the repentance dynamic. Which - literally translated - is 'new-mind' not 'I'm sorry.' New context, new way of looking at things... An interior reaction to an external stimulus, as Jonathan Edwards would say (The Will is much more interesting than the sermon of Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God).
ReplyDeleteI’m learning to read scripture outside the capitalist narrative. That narrative says the pursuit of wealth through self-interest is the moral standard. Sinners are those who don’t seek their own economic accumulation. Thus we blame the poor. This reverses scripture.
ReplyDeleteSinners are those “add field to field”, ignore the plight of the widow and orphan (the families of peasant soldiers fallen in battle), and charge interest on loans to those suffering crop loss. Sinners impoverish their neighbors and weaken the national strength and unity of a widespread prosperous people.
Tax collectors gained wealth through charging more than they need to return to Rome (even Temple taxes involved paying the national tribute - it’s how Herod’s family became sovereign and why Pilate was stationed with an army in Palestine).
Jesus is eating with those who need to learn Jubilee as the way to God’s reign. The Separatists complain because they believe community purity leads to God’s reign. Jesus is redeeming the wealthy from their greed and self-interest.
Look at the examples: a hundred sheep ranch is significant in Jesus’ day. Ten silver pieces is the annual wage of a unskilled labor - and a woman has it. The impoverished don’t have a year’s wage on hand - most not even a week.
So imagine tax collectors not charging tolls or at least not overcharging, or lenders who do not charge interest and do not expect anything in return.
That’s joy in heaven and on earth.
Russell Meyer, Mdiv, Dmin
That'll preach, Russell. Thanks.
DeleteMD